








On this, my most recent job interview, I found myself less worried about the impression I made on the world, than the impression the job and its surroundings made on me. Having been to the London Middlesex suburb once before, and left unimpressed, I felt the need to explore. It is a village cum suburb which neither aspires to, nor achieves, a sense of quaintness. Here, the high street comprises establishments of three categories: home improvement, feeding and drinking. You live here, you have to eat (though just how this small community can conceivably consume that much junk food is a mystery) and you drink to forget about it all. Perhaps it is an indication of this pragmatism that Tesco Metro and the Methodist church share a building (and a bell tower) in the middle of the street.
Having done the high street in 4,3 minutes, I had ample time to explore the residential areas. And was immediately struck by a realisation: the people who live here don’t use the village centre. Ever. The comfortable, pleasant and at times very pretty homes suggested an affluence not present on the high street. No, this was the perfect sleeper town. Any needs beyond the four walls of home can be fulfilled elsewhere. By car.
My walk finally ended with me ending up at my destination. I look for work along three parameters: relevance, location and salary. And this job scored quite low on them all. Living in a place which most people can’t get out of fast enough? Or having to live somewhere else and commute to a place which most people can’t get out of fast enough? Commuting, by the way, strikes me as unhealthy. At least in big cities. My day took me from Woking, via north London city, to Middlesex. And back. I’d love to know just how far I travelled, and at what average speed. Maybe humans should come with mileage counters?
…all important ingredients for a Swedish midsummer. The first you eat, as they are or with cream or sugar or both, the second you put in your schnapps, to make it taste like medicine and therefore providing you with an even better excuse to drink it, and the third you, if you are a young girl, collect during the night. Yes, girls who want to dream about their future husband only have to collect seven different flowers, climb over seven fences and not utter a word in the process and their dreams will reveal all. I have never managed it; the flowers and the being silent is not a problem, finding adequate fences in a city, however, is.We had been invited by friends who had courageously set the table outside (under a roof), in bold defiance of the dark skies. It was the coldest day for a long time, which in a way is traditional. Heat will undoubtedly set in on Monday. These friends deal in art, and have it everywhere: on the walls of the patio and in the shed. In the house you can’t find the walls for paintings.
The host, a dominating presence at the best of times, greeted us with flowers on the head and a bottle of homemade schnapps, looking less like a hippie and more like the second coming of Puck or a faun in a suit. The guests were a mixed bunch, several generations, nationalities and languages. As the evening, and indeed the schnapps distribution, progressed, the three languages became more and more intertwined. We had the traditional food, but did not indulge in traditional dancing around a flower-clad pole. As no midsummer celebrations are complete without the handling of some phallic object, however, the men decided that the flagpole had to come down to be fixed. And that a hay fork might be useful in the process. The women immediately started talking about how lovely it is to put dried lavender in the linen cupboard and just like that we had restored the gender conventions of society. It may have been the wormwood.
By that time, the sun had decided to make an appearance after all and in the end, the most important thing about midsummer (and, indeed, summer) is strawberries. Of which there were plenty. Our American guest wondered if Swedish parties always comprise several eating sessions, and that was before the final session – coffee and raisin scones, baked by the Dutch guest. (At some point I will have to tell her that we even have traditions and terminology for the food you give the guests in the middle of the night, if the party goes on for that long.)
I had a few drops of cognac and with it an epiphany. (This blog is fast becoming Proustian.) Whisky is an acquired taste, one I spent some time acquiring and now have a profound love for. Cognac is also an acquired taste, and one that, until last summer, I simply hadn’t acquired. In many situations where cognac is an option, whisky is too. So I go for the whisky. Anyway. Last summer I happened to be given a bottle of cognac, and around the same time I had been persuaded it was imperative that I see The Office. The pain and squirming which previous attempts at watching The Office had generated had to be overcome and I suddenly came up with an incredibly cunning plan: I would combine the two projects. So I drank copious amounts of cognac and watched The Office with a marathon-like dedication until I liked them both. So far, so good. But because I haven’t had many other occasions to drink it since, the taste (even if this was a different, and for me new, kind) now immediately conjures up images of a certain workplace in Slough. My nose and its memory. What have I done?
I haven’t picked any flowers (even if I did come home with my bag full of lavender for some reason), but I certainly hope all this does not mean that I will dream about Ricky Gervais.
I had an epiphany to the effect while I was in London, on the tube. That is in itself extraordinary (not the content, I’m sure many people on the Bakerloo line wish they were somewhere else), as there wasn’t really room to have anything, not even a small epiphany. Events conspired and I found myself needlessly in rush hour twice that day, crammed into the confined space of a train carriage with hundreds of strangers. An inferno on rails, scorching heat, people frantically trying to ignore the temperature and each other – as well as forgetting the report in the paper that an accident in the underground had been narrowly avoided that morning (a driver having got in at the wrong end of the train and set of in the wrong direction). Very Danteesque. Yes, standing in an underground train somewhere between Piccadilly circus and Waterloo, trying not to tread on more than one person’s toes at any one time, is the antithesis of my running path. There may be people who love it, or at least are untroubled by it, but most of my fellow sufferers last Thursday looked like they would have been happier elsewhere. Apart from being an, admittedly, effective way to get around London, the tube is also a marvellous place for exploring humanity. The hordes of people around me resembled mistreated cattle more than human beings, but every time I smiled at someone they smiled back. We're all just trying to cope with the lack of space.
Wherever I end up in the near future I hope there is open space, but also a place with people. They are quite nice, really.


The 6th of June was the day that saw Sweden break out in allergies.
I don’t think it has very much to do with the National Day – even if we still haven’t figured out what to do with it. I mean, it’s not like this is the day Sweden won its freedom from oppression by means of, say, a revolution. Back in the day Sweden was the big superpower that, it anything, oppressed others. By the time we had world wars in more recent history, Sweden had retreated into a corner, tried to be neutral and consolidated the status of has-been with the national anthem, which states our determination to remember the days of past glory rather than seek new ones. Nationalism in Sweden can neither take it’s impulse from being a superpower nor from being gloriously rid of a superpower. We’re just quite well off, basically, and that fails to serve as an impulse for carnivals or Guinness-infused mayhem.
I had something of an epiphany to the effect a couple of weeks ago. Having visited my father’s grave, and reflected on the loveliness of the little country cemetery as well as the fact that our dead are better off than the living in many countries, my mum and I went to Helsingborg for lunch. Walking on the coast, among the beautiful new houses and the trendy cafés and seeing the boats, the dogs and the beautiful people sauntering around, looking happy, healthy and content in the glorious sunshine of a Sunday in May, I realised just how well off we are. I always know this, of course, but that afternoon really served to hammer the point in. Can’t remember complaining much about anything since.
Except allergies. I believe in the theory that allergies are something we have brought upon ourselves and my runny nose, then, becomes just another galling reminder of my “being well off complex”. Grass, apparently, is my trigger and today the grass must be in full bloom because my nose (along with eyes and ears) is not happy at all. Nor are those of other people. Seeing as the National Day is a bank holiday, there is only one open pharmacy in my home town. And it, according to the lovely girl I spoke to, ran out of allergy medicine early in the morning. Annoying. But hardly a catastrophe in global terms.
So, I’m sure many other Swedes with hay fever spent the National Day sneezing and rubbing their sore eyes while being nationalistic in the only way we are really good at: happily supporting our national football team. They even managed to win.
We attempted the Art Gallery of Malmö, a place which we have of course visited many times before but which, as a small museum, almost only houses temporary exhibitions. Something new every time. It was, to our great chagrin, closed, and propelled us in the direction of the parks. Rain lurked in the dark sky (a fact that had caused us to abandon early plans involving the outdoors) but we decided to look up the newly created ‘Linnaeus garden’ in Kungsparken, only one of the masses of initiatives marking the tercentenary of the great man’s birth. This anniversary has largely passed me by; my acquaintance with Linnaeus being limited to reading some of his travel narratives. They, on the other hand, are a pretty good read – the man could concoct a cracking metaphor for things he observed in nature. The garden was nice, if small, an sandwiched in between a rose garden and a school garden: an initiative which has allocated a little square for the pupils of various schools to cultivate stuff in.
The fresh air of the park was eventually substituted for the stuffiness of the Castle museum, which welcomes its visitors with an enormous giraffe in the reception. This is partly to confuse tourists, of course, but mainly to introduce the lower floor animal exhibition of living as well as stuffed creatures. We only visited one exhibition in the building before succumbing to the stuffiness (how did those animals die? I have a theory) and seeking fresh air and food. The exhibition was all about coffee, and very interesting. It explored everything from the actual coffee beans and the working conditions of those who provide us with our beloved morning (and lunch and afternoon and evening) drink, to the role coffee has played in revolutions and recipe for a Swedish ‘Kaffegök’: Put a penny in the bottom of a cup, fill it with coffee until you can no longer see the coin, then fill it with aquavit until the coin reappears… There was also a lovely collection of paraphernalia surrounding coffee culture throughout the ages.
Fortified by a little walk and some lunch (pizza) we went to a fairly new coffee shop, one which only uses fair trade coffee. After the exhibition it was the only option, really – we really wanted coffee, and we really wanted it to be fair trade… The café is a trendy one; long gone are days when fair trade and organic food was for hippies only – now it’s chic. It sells. And as long as the produce used is genuine that is a very good thing, at the end of the day perhaps the only way to change people’s habits into sustainable ones is to make the sustainable ones…trendy. We live in a rich country, after all, and if it becomes trendy to pay a little more for organic/fair trade produce it may actually boost long-term change. Maybe.
By the time we had finished our lovely lattes (a phenomenon which has palpably increased the milk consumption in the country – hmm…) and had tired of the somewhat psychedelic décor, we decided it was time for a new project. And went to a football game. By that time the weather had improved well past immediate rain threat, so we made our way to Malmö Stadium to watch our boys in blue take on Gefle. The sun shone a little over the first half, but disappeared again for the second – and that goes for the game as well. Bright start, Malmö controlled most of the game and got an early goal, only to lose momentum and finally end with a 1-1 draw. I love the hardcore Malmö support, singing their little blue hearts out non-stop for 90 minutes and managing to mask the fact that the 26000 capacity stadium only had 9500 people in it… Marvellous way to spend a Sunday evening, despite the draw.
Probably realising that they could have to wait another 40 years or so before staging the event again – by which time it may very well comprise 60 countries (I can see it now, Wales and Kazakhstan) – the Finns had put a lot of effort in. Understated and quirky little film clips, adorable presenters, monsters, Santa Claus and, best of all, heavy cello rock with head-banging. Yes, this has redefined coolness for me. Big guys head-banging while playing rock music on cellos. Wow. And it had to be in Finland, somehow.
Before making my own, highly subjective and opinionated, assessment of the actual songs, I almost feel obliged to address the topic of voting and the Balkan mafia, concepts which have sparked controversy in countries which feel that they should get votes simply because they always used to in the past. The Eastern block countries all voted for each other, basically. Ireland came last. Therefore there is a conspiracy. But there has always been some “neighbourly voting”, in the Mediterranean, in Scandinavia, among the German speaking countries, among the English speaking countries – and this was before we had the people’s vote. Thus it proved again, Ireland incomprehensibly gave 12 points to the UK, Sweden awarded theirs to Finland and so on. But the main factor behind the Eastern block countries getting the most points was the simple little fact that they had the best songs! Regional radio exposure of songs will continue to be a factor – people in Scandinavia have been listening to The Ark for weeks now, the Irish have probably been plagued by Scooch and in the Balkans… catch my drift? Whoever wins will have a song so strong that it gets votes from outside its region.
This really is of no significance in the greater scheme of things but I happened to watch the event on a German channel – the Germans, predictably, were disgruntled to find that in a Europe where everyone votes for their friends (if we accept that that is the case), Germany has no friends. Poor them. The Swedes, similarly, felt hard done by – Finland actually gave their 12 to Serbia! There is a case to be made for reorganising the event somehow, it is a bit unwieldy, but at the end of the day it is just a song contest. You know, a bit of fun.
I downloaded the songs on the night before and listened to them, which meant that I had heard them all but not seen the performers or their performances. It wasn’t an intentional strategy, but it ended up being very interesting – some songs rose considerably in my estimation upon seeing them performed, others… I have also watched the videos on the Swedish Television website for ESC, the size and ambition of which almost exceeds the official website of the competition. The end result according to my ever so carefully considered evaluation:
1. Serbia: Molitva
The right song rightly won. Brought tears to my eyes the first time I heard it, still sends shivers down my spine every time. Powerful, moving, fabulous song, sung in the native language of its country. I liked the performance as well, but I don’t think any performance could have added or detracted from the song. It stands, a worthy winner – too good for this competition, even.
2. FYR Macedonia: Mojot Svet
Lovely Balkan-pop song, catchy and vigorous. Makes me happy and bouncy, even if the superfluous dancing and the peculiar outfit nearly dragged the points down.
Wonderful power-ballad about the river of pain that is heartache. More Balkan shivers down my spine – I suppose I have to confess my soft spot for these languages (when sung) somewhere. Beautiful performance (green) but one which almost detracted from the song. Might have been more effective with Maria just standing still and letting, as it were, the music speak.
4. Sweden: The worrying kind
Yes, I did like the silly boys, even if their performance on the night was very shaky – but then I had heard the song on the radio so much that I knew what it was supposed to sound like. (See?) Abba rhythm, glam rock costume, Bowie lyrics… so un-unoriginal that it became fun. And it is a very catchy tune.
5. Bulgaria: Water
Water-themed ethno-techno with voice and drums – a song which I had initially written off but became impressed with as I saw the performance. You can always sell me drums. (And, some people would argue, Bulgarians.) I like it more and more.
6. France: L’amour a la francaise
Ah, the French. Not a great song, but nicely upbeat – and, more importantly, a great performance. This song has single-handedly confirmed a nagging suspicion of mine: there are French people with a sense of humour. These lads (who, let us not forget, were chosen to represent their country) have it in abundance, sporting pink suits and a text in Franglais. It still brings a smile to my face every time…
7. Georgia: Visionary Dream
A Georgian Björk, interesting tune and very accomplished singing. For sheer quality it merits a higher place, but I’m not crazy about Björk…
8. Ukraine: Dancing lasha tumbai
Verka Serduchka is not only a tinfoil transvestite, he is also a comedian. And this was fun.
9. Moldavia: Fight
Minus points for singing in English, but powerful rhythm and guitars. And a fiddle. We like fiddles.
10. Slovenia: Cvet z juga
I like the girl, the sound, the performance, the country. Something missing from the actual song, though. Points for singing in native language.
11. Finland: Leave me alone
I like the girl, the sound, the performance, the country… but the song was just not good enough. Too much teenage angst in the lyrics. Not enough punch. Hanna needed more punch.
12. Belarus: Work your magic
Had chemist-turned-pop-star Koldun sung in his native tongue, two things would have been achieved: more points from me and less pronunciation embarrassment. As it was his “willing” became, irrevocably, “wheeling”, conjured up all kinds of weird images in my head and sank the song. Having seen the video it really was a case of nice video, shame about the song. Also shame about the orange make-up they put the poor man in, it severely undermined his bid for “hunk of the competition” (as the commentator put it).
13. Hungary: Unsubstantial blues
Another case of great professional performance which deserved a lot more points but good as this song was it had precious little to do with the competition – or Hungary, for that matter. Sung in Hungarian I might have fallen for it.
Cheerful and bouncy. Not sure what the mixture of the languages did for anyone.
15. Russia: Song #1
TATU with more attitude? Heard and seen it before. Often.
Points to the Germans for sending a professional singing in German and not a clown. But somehow this little swing number did a Finland and fell between all chairs. Also not helped by the fact that I understand the language and don’t like the lyrics…
I’ve already forgotten this song. That was its chief problem.
Sweet little song and usually Irish pipes send me over the hills but it just went all wrong – if Ireland start sending people who can’t sing in key we are on a slippery slope.
Pale Ricky Martin wannabe with silly song – again a song which could have sounded marginally better in a language which is, well, Greek to the rest of Europe. The tedium would have been alleviated if Sarbel had gotten entangled in his scantily clad dancers. But the rope trick was pulled off and we fell asleep.
20. Latvia: Questa Notte
A bunch of Latvian men in hats singing Italian mock-opera. Badly. If there had been an element of humour in this it might have been saved.
21. Romania: Liubi, liubi, I love you
The Ukrainians sing (well count) in German, Latvians sing in Italian, the French play with English, most just use it – but this conglomeration of languages in a steadily accelerating song just made my head spin. And when you thought it couldn’t get any worse they allowed it to turn into something which sounded like syrtaki on speed.
22. Armenia: Anytime you need
Sentimental rubbish. I only woke up when the Moldavian rhythms woke me up.
23. Turkey: Shake it up shekerim
The commentator had the audacity to compare this with Sertab’s 2003 winner. He should be shot. This was an utter embarrassment, on all levels. How this ended up on fourth place is anybody’s guess.
24. UK: Flying the flag (for you)
Everyone involved should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.
So, there we have it. Some songs shouldn’t have been allowed to enter, others should really have made it from the semi-final – I missed Montenegro’s rock tune, Iceland’s ballad and Norway’s dance act (which was written by the Swedish pop factory and, had it been sung in Norwegian, would have been quite good). The Swiss vampires would have been less dull than the Armenian bloke… But in general I’m happy. You need some crappy tunes. It’s part of the fun. But I do think we should go back to singing in our native languages. How else am I going to be guaranteed my annual dose of Serbian?
It's raining cats, dogs and an assortment of other furry animals but I needed a walk. Partly because I actually needed a walk, and partly because one of the more sensible options available to me had I not gone out was one of the many house cleansing projects lurking in the hinterland of my mind. They were on a list, then submitted to memory and finally pushed back, by a strangely effortless process of denial into the dark and dusty area of the subconscious usually reserved for guilt, dead bunnies and lost mental property. The fact that the idea even arose was because my friend S wrote on her blog about the chaos of her parent’s garage, a chaos in every way matched by the chaos in my mothers house where, for a little while at least, I reside.
I realised recently that I have been watching far too much football, been thinking far too much about football and certainly been writing too much about football. My other blogs have been neglected – an indication that life has been somewhat narrow lately…
Just before Easter I handed in my “gorilla” (code in certain circles for dissertation) for supervision; soon it will be groomed and put in a cage. While struggling with it, hiding from the world and basically just going for walks and smelling the world in my spare time, football, as ever, nicely filled up what remained of the days. I suppose it is an obsessive compulsive disorder, but a nice one. When I have had time for nothing else I’ve always kept in touch with the news and the progression of “my boys”, as I always will. It’s about a special brand of love.
But when, as of late, “spare time” is filled with little else proportions start getting muddled. I am a football fan of the nerdy, analytical variety – I love my team and I will analyse what happens, regardless of result. I can feel pride and joy about a display of nice football, even when the team is defeated. A win makes me deliriously happy while a defeat usually just brings out the analytical mind. Some sadness, never anger. On Thursday, however, the defeat really did get me down. As ever, I felt sorry for the lads rather than angry with them for not winning, but it made me genuinely sad. And I realised that I needed my proportions back, just as I realised, again, that people who live only for this can’t do that. They will grieve the loss of the UEFA cup longer than I will.
The sun is shining, and Friday was a great day – I cycled around for an hour before meeting a dear friend. We sat in outside in the sun, drank copious amounts of orange juice and talked about life; life as in all the rest of it. She has no interest in sport and I love that. Spring, we came to realise, is a state of mind as well as a season – and what a nice one it is. Sitting as we did on the main square of this little city, we observed people in a spring state of
mind, milling around and happily taking in the blessing that is a Friday afternoon in sunny April. Where did all these beautiful people come from? wondered she; I suppose we are all more beautiful in the spring. Because we smile more?
Later on I indulged in another favourite pastime with some other dear friends: whisky and beer tasting. Yes, it is quite possible to be very nerdy about alcohol as well. And my nose, one of the main characters in this blog, is of course delighted with the worlds that a glass of whisky has on offer. One will smell like a beach on a windy day, another like a stable full of old leather – my unfettered nose can find a narrative in the glass, along with the taste notes.
So in the end, I got my proportions right back. Still a bit sad, but hardly devastated. After all, if the result in a football game is the only thing that makes you sad you’re doing quite well. And if Roy Keane can say “It’s just a game of football”, then so can I. And of course mean it every bit as much as he does.

Friday was red nose day in England, a day of comedy for charity, instigated by Comic Relief and with the purpose of raising money by cheering people up. And what a great idea that is. Sir Jonathan Sacks, chief rabbi, addressed the topic in his Thought for the Day on BBC Radio Four’s Today programme. He pointed out that there is something spiritual about humour, our ability to laugh at something meaning that we are less intimidated by it: “humour is the opening of freedom in the prison wall of fate; it’s a close relative of hope”. Humour heightens humanity and creates bonds. How true.


Postmodernism or post-modernism, a concept - or two - so hard to define that it is barely a concept. The fact that it is impossible to define with any degree of satisfaction or success is perhaps in itself the epitome of the post-modern condition. Whatever that is. You see?
Nick Hornby, in "Fever Pitch" described the Dutch invention Total Football as the footballing version of postmodernism; people playing out of their expected positions in order to surprise and attack better. Of course, it only works up to a point. But the idea of playing out of position is an instructive one. Because perhaps postmodernism is simply that - changing positions, revealing the norms of society by breaking them, inverting them. Expose master narratives as being discourse. Question everything and see where you end up. So you are a defender? Who decided that you can't make a run and score a goal? The manager - or tradition? Why listen to authority at all? And who decided that the pitch should be rectangular - and covered with grass? And then we have to take a step back and realise that some things are required if we want to keep the game intact. And a theory of rejecting theories (Tony Cliff) is, of course, a theory.
So what does this have to do with music? Well, I first started thinking about postmodernism in conjunction with music on Wednesday when a student brass band where entertaining bemused innocent bystanders in the very modern university building which houses, among other things, my department. A new glass contrivance has been placed among three existing buildings, connecting them and making them one big centre for humanistic research. Outside walls became inside walls, inside walls became inner balconies - in fact, the whole thing is rather postmodern. So, in the former courtyard, now the cafeteria, we were entertained by a group of people who, as the gig proceeded started moving out of position - walking around with trumpets among people trying to eat lunch and availing themselves of the inner balconies and stairs to create a feeling of omnipresence rather than a stage act. Audience became participants, musicians hid behind chairs… and so on. Changing positions, basically.
http://www.stockholmlisboa.com/
I must confess to not watching all the programmes – by way of boycott and sheer lack of interest in an event that just cannot merit quite this much attention. Due to a rigorous selection policy, the songs that finally made it to the main final were all variations of the bestselling concept that is a Swedish ESC winner. Three ballad efforts and the singer-songwriter number made it seem a little more varied than it really was. The songs which brought the ESC to Sweden were all similar – as were these songs. Needless to say it works quite well, catchy, happy tunes which stick in your head like a persistent migraine. I liked most of them and am still cheerfully humming. And am quite impressed by that the fact that I have for the first time in my life been seduced by something approximating a latino lover act – and what finally did it was a local lad, 20 years of age. How postmodern of me. Some songs were in Swedish, most were in English – and contained quaint little grammatical errors and faulty pronunciation which made the artists appear not only conventional but also mildly illiterate.
Ultimately, this conventionality of the songs undermined the postmodern efforts to make the actual competition a little different. Again. The presenter did his best to do the unexpected, make meta-jokes and turn the whole thing a bit queer. But essentially, having two men sing a love song and do a romantic dance towards the end seemed just as formulaic as everything else. The postmodernism that is the Swedish song competition has just done a full circle. By now the revolutionary thing might be to bring back the actual traditional concept. The song which in the end won (quite as expected) epitomised the fact that the queer postmodern irony of this competition is just gloss – even if it is entertaining when the skimpiest little outfit of the whole evening covers (or un-covers) a man. While the stage performance differed from all the others, the song itself is a conglomeration of all the songs this country has won the competition with. And the outfits, while marvellously silly, just don’t reach the silliness standard of 1974. But the refrain sums up the whole discussion of postmodernism quite well:
Words, I’d like to shake ‘em
Shake them from my troublesome mind
And you turn up your nose
It’s a joke you suppose
But baby, I’m the worrying kind
Don’t even know if the double meaning is intentional, but very few people would be deeply worried at this stage. Because in the end what can be more conventionally postmodern than a modern-retro glam rock band from southern Sweden that almost, but not quite, takes itself seriously? Yet, more importantly, what could be more old school? An updated rendition of Waterloo sung by a group of lads who look and sound like The Sweet. Europe, we proudly give you - The Ark.
The weather has been obliging again. Sunshine with a spring feel last Sunday, the same today. After months of cold, wet darkness one day a week becomes a treat. Surely we cannot ask for more.
I've called this blog coffee spoon measure, and today was just such a little measure of life. Not a great day (I woke up late after a turbulent night with more stomach cramps than sleep and felt miserable) but a quite good one nonetheless. I took my harassed body on a walk through the fields north of Lund, let the sun shine on my upturned and smiling face and just enjoyed the smells of the fields, the odd tree and the little patches of grass. The snow is almost gone, only the odd little lonely pile remaining in places, and the ground underneath awakens again. This year it has not been covered by much snow - this has not only been the warmest winter for a very, very long time, but, according to meteorologists, not even a winter at all in technical terms - but somehow the uncovering process can still be felt. For me, at least, mainly because it uncovers the scent of spring, the earthiness of the fields and the grass being the first smells to return.
The smell of spring is in fact a multitude of different smells, and all have their time. They arrive in the same order, every year and are to be held accountable for the giddy madness which overcomes me every year in March. Uncovered earth is the first one and today it reminded me how easily a bad day can become a good one and how the things that make this life so wonderful are small and there for the taking. A walk in fresh air - a measure of life.
Bowen herself explored the ghostly nature of texts, people, the past and memory; how the fictional can be as real as the actual, and how our senses of self and our senses of each other are subjective and complicated. Her wisdom in these matters is something that I find myself respecting, just as I respect and love to study how she treated all these subjects in her fiction. Examining Elizabeth Bowen’s writing has given me much food for thought about literature itself and why and how we interact with it.
The work that I am doing now, of which a dissertation on Bowen is to be the outcome, began with Henry James, on the back of a longer involvement with Virginia Woolf. Fascinated by their fiction I also studied some of their other writing. And while they will never cease to amaze me, for all kinds of reasons, I never felt a connection, never felt that I wanted to throw my lot in with either of them for a longer period of time. At times, they even annoyed me a little. Elizabeth and I will have our disagreements, inevitably, but I feel that this is but the beginning of a beautiful friendship.